In many cases, that is likely to mean survivors foregoing sums worth of tens of thousands of pounds to KP Law, which says it is working for hundreds of people who suffered abuse committed by Mohamed al Fayed.
Money latest: Boost for holidaymakers amid 'awful April' bill hikes Under a redress scheme outlined by the London-based department store on Monday, which confirmed earlier reports by Sky News, claimants will be eligible for general damages awards of up to £200,000, depending upon whether they agree to a psychiatric assessment arranged by Harrods.
In addition, other payments could take the maximum award to an individual under the scheme to £385,000. A document published online names several law firms which have agreed to represent Mr al Fayed's victims without absorbing any of their compensation payments.
KP Law is not among those firms. Theoretically, if Justice for Harrods members are awarded compensation in excess of the sums proposed by the company, KP Law could stand to earn many millions of pounds from its share of the payouts.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
A Harrods spokesperson told Sky News on Tuesday: "The purpose of the Harrods Redress Scheme is to offer financial and psychological support to those who choose to enter the scheme, rather than as a route to criminal justice. "With a survivor-first approach, it has been designed by personal injury experts with the input of several legal firms currently representing survivors. "Although Harrods tabled the scheme, control of the claim is in the hands of the survivors who can determine at any point to continue, challenge, opt out or seek alternative routes such as mediation or litigation. "Our hope is that everyone receives 100% of the compensation awarded to them but we understand there is one exception among these law firms currently representing survivors who is proposing to take up to 25% of survivors' compensation. "We hope they will reconsider given we have already committed to paying reasonable legal costs."
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
Responding to the publication of the scheme on Monday, KP Law criticised it as inadequate, saying it "does not go far enough to deliver the justice and accountability demanded by our clients". "This is not solely a question of compensation but about justice and exposing the systematic abuse and the many people who helped to operate it for the benefit of Mohamed al Fayed and others." Seeking to rebut the questions raised by Harrods about its fee structure, KP Law told Sky News: "KP Law is committed to supporting our clients through the litigation process to obtain justice first and foremost as well as recovering the maximum possible damages for them. "This will cover all potential outcomes for the case. "Despite the Harrods scheme seeking to narrow the potential issues, we believe that there are numerous potential defendants in a number of jurisdictions that are liable for what our clients went through, and we are committed to securing justice for our client group. "KP Law is confident that it will recover more for its clients than what could be achieved through the redress scheme established by Harrods, which in our view is inadequate and does not go far enough to compensate victims of Mr al Fayed."
The verbal battle between Harrods and KP Law underlines the fact that the battle for compensation and wider justice for survivors of Mr al Fayed remains far from complete. The billionaire, who died in 2023, is thought to have sexually abused hundreds of women during a 25-year reign of terror at Harrods.
He also owned Fulham Football Club and Paris's Ritz Hotel. Harrods is now owned by a Qatari sovereign wealth fund controlled by the Gulf state's ruling family. The redress scheme commissioned by the department store is being coordinated by MPL Legal, an Essex-based law firm.
Last October, lawyers acting for victims of Mr al Fayed said they had received more than 420 enquiries about potential claims, although it is unclear how many more have come forward in the six months since.
Comments
Post a Comment